In the Pines

Occupy Monterey camp at Veterans Park struggles to integrate homeless.

Were it not for a few handmade signs posted around the picnic area, you’d never know the half-dozen tents spread amongst the trees in Veteran’s Park Nov. 6 are part of an organized occupation. 


It’s a stark contrast to the day before, when nearly 150 people gathered on the lawn in front of Monterey’s City Hall for a press conference kicking off the Occupy Monterey encampment. The boisterous cheers and strident signs of Saturday’s actions are nowhere to be found in the Sunday evening chill. 


“It’s like the city planned this so we would be out of the way,” says a 20-year-old ‘houseless’ traveler who goes by Cardinal. Another teenager from Monterey pipes up: “Why aren’t we in front of City Hall, anyway? So the tourists don’t see us?”


An older voice responds. 


“We want to pull the town along with us and not upset everyone and disturb them,” says Tim Wilson, an unemployed Monterey resident.


Some Occupiers wanted to push the city for camping privileges on the City Hall lawn; others, citing the city’s willingness to waive fees at Veterans Park and open the lawn for a 24/7 vigil space, thought the park’s group campsite was the best choice. The encampment pitched its first tents a mile from downtown Saturday night.


Zandy Crawford, an Occupier who’s homeless, sees the encampment as more than a way to placate the city. 


“Out here, where people get face-to-face with each other and realize that the person wearing ripped-up clothing is just another person, this is where the re-teaching and un-learning happens,” says Crawford, who’s been occupying forests, parks and alleyways for years. 


Adds Ray Arrowood, a “nomadic” Vietnam vet: “The homeless are the best bet for keeping this thing going. What better symbol for the clash between the 99 percent and the 1 percent than the bottom of the 99 percent?”


View Photos from Occupy movements in Monterey and Oakland.

But not everyone shares his sentiments. Later that evening, a pair of homeless youth leave the encampment after being denounced for drunkenness and threatening violence. Occupier and Marina resident Colin Gallagher says the balance between building community and enforcing order is difficult, particularly for a diverse and diffuse movement like Occupy.


“City officials told us we were going to have to deal with homeless people,” Gallagher says. “We’re not going to exclude people just because they have issues, but we do have to have some level of de-escalation in place.” 


The homeless Occupiers present a nuanced challenge for encampments from Oakland to Toronto to Wall Street. Some are sane and healthy; others struggle with addiction and mental illness. 


Santa Cruz city officials started cracking down on their local Occupy encampment in San Lorenzo Park last week after increasing numbers of homeless people provoked complaints from residents. Yet many feel the homeless are central to a movement aimed at eradicating economic injustice. 


“People have been occupying Chinatown [in Salinas] for decades,” says longtime homeless outreach worker Peter Nelson. “They aren’t protesting injustice, but they’re experiencing it.” He’s offered to work with Occupy Monterey’s encampment to navigate the challenges of integrating the homeless into their movement.


Gallagher says the homeless must be included in Occupy Monterey: “Should people refuse to support that, it’s a refusal to accept the new reality this nation is facing.”

Comments

simple1248 says...

Fairly well rounded article, but I do take issue with one stanza:

"The homeless Occupiers present a nuanced challenge for encampments from Oakland to Toronto to Wall Street. Some are sane and healthy; others struggle with addiction and mental illness."

The reason why this does not sit well with me is that it suggests that addiction and mental illness is a problem of the homeless. Actually the largest demographic of drug abusers comes from the privileged tiers of society: those individuals who can afford such luxuries.

The whole reason for the popular conception that drugs are low class is because the more impoverished members of society cannot afford another luxury: privacy. The wealthy can afford to use all of their very expensive intoxicants in their buffered domiciles while the poor are subjected to a vicious environment in which crime rates are measured by how often people get caught doing something.

Not being able to afford privacy or legal defense results in high crime rates that are out of synch with reality, which in turn results in more police funding and more arrests, a vicious cycle for the poor.

For us Occupiers drug use is far below what you will find in your typical cloistered suburbia.

In my opinion mental illness is a whole other story. (Reagan)
a few seconds ago · Like

Posted 10 November 2011, 10 a.m. Suggest removal

gjwilmot says...

Drug Addiction is an illness, which needs to be treated.
Just like any other illness. Including mental illness.

Unfortunately medical care in this country is not a right,
but a privilege for those who can afford it.

What we see in the homeless is a side effect of not getting
good medical care.

Posted 10 November 2011, 1:57 p.m. Suggest removal

simple1248 says...

Drug Addiction is more of an upper class problem because they can afford to be addicts. Homelessness is a homeless problem. Mental illness is an American problem.

Posted 10 November 2011, 3:31 p.m. Suggest removal

pcvcolin says...

For those interested in contributing to or participating in the Camp please link here: http://www.occupymontereypeninsula.or...

Posted 11 November 2011, 12:57 a.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment