0

News Blog

UPDATED: Museum of Monterey Executive Director Quits; City Manager "Extremely Concerned" About MoM's Future

Monterey's fragile hopes for its newly revamped maritime museum have been dashed with today's news that Executive Director John Bailey has quit. Bailey's resignation comes just nine days after the Museum of Monterey (formerly the Monterey History and Maritime Museum) reopened with much fanfare after a 15-month hiatus; in the wake of numerous recent exits by MoM staff; and amidst community murmurs about Board mismanagement and conflicts of interest.

"I've loved working for the Museum," Bailey said Monday from his home in Pebble Beach. He declined to comment further on the circumstances that led to his resignation, but added, "I see myself as a fixer," implying that if he couldn't help a wayward organization, it couldn't be done.

City Councilmember Nancy Selfridge concurred. "John is very highly regarded in the Monterey community," Selfridge said Monday. "The fact that he couldn't take it anymore says a lot."

Bailey also mentioned that during his last stint as executive director from 2005-2006, he presented the museum's Board of Directors with a business plan that would have served as a road map to financial solvency.

"I suggested several steps to solve their financial problems, including selling a house that at that time I was told by realtors we'd get $2.5 million for," Bailey said. "The Board could have started an endowment, but they didn't do it. They ended up selling it last year for less than $1 million."

The current Board, impressed by Bailey's rejected business plan of yore, asked him back late last year in part because they needed his fiscal leadership. Bailey was scheduled to present a financial assessment of the museum to the Board and City Council June 30, but his departure makes the future of that report uncertain. A museum staffer who chose to remain anonymous told the Weekly, "The decisions and actions I have seen made by the Board are sloppy, inefficient and immature." The source cited numerous alleged conflicts of interest involving contracts awarded to friends of Board President Tom Hood and other Board members for consulting and construction services without ever being put out to bid.

"Andre Mirpolsky, who did the museum's new mural, is good friends with [Board member] Mark Baer," Selfridge added. "[The musem] didn't do a public bidding process at all to try and get someone local." Museum staff were not available for comment Monday.

Reached by phone Tuesday morning, Hood called those allegations "completely outrageous. Everyone hired was not the only one considered. The fact that I may have a professional relationship with one of these people is for the benefit of the organization." Additionally, Hood said that Bailey had not contacted him about resigning, nor about the fact that his financial report was not yet complete. "I sincerely regret that John has reportedly resigned," Hood said. "I'd love to be able to have a conversation with him, and I wish that had occurred before he made this decision."

Tim Thomas, who worked as a curator and historian at the museum for 16 years and did a brief stint as interim executive director before being laid off in fall 2009, recalled his unexplained "throwing out" by museum leadership "just awful." When Hood returned to him several months later, imploring him for help with new exhibits and apologizing for his Board's treatment of Thomas, "I decided to go down and help them, to make sure the stories they're telling are accurate. Then I found out that they were using my name to lure other folks who weren't willing to participate, and I was very upset." Hood called Thomas's allegations "complete fabrications."

Perhaps the most damning words about the supposedly new and improved museum were issued by Monterey City Manager Fred Meurer in a memo sent Friday to Bailey. Ostensibly regarding a financial review of the museum Bailey was working on (and which is now in limbo due to his departure), Meurer quickly segues into a larger discussion of MoM's future. "I continue to be extremely concerned that the [Monterey History and Art Association, which runs the museum] lacks a sound exhibit and interpretation, business and operational plans," Meurer wrote. He goes on to say that the City would like to see a plan from MoM to "allay concerns about the museum's new direction."

"I regret that [Bailey] made the decision to keep that memo confidential from the Board," Hood said. As to the museum's current financial state, he added, "The organization is not in trouble. We had 1500 people come in in our first two days [June 4 and 5], we've been doing very brisk retail sales, and we're fulfilling the mission of the museum: tell the stories of Monterey through arts, innovation, history and maritime stories." They'll have to do so without an executive director at the helm—at least for now.

Comments

jakestern says...

I drove up from Los Angeles for the sole purpose of attending the June 4th opening. One primary reason was due to artist Andre Mirapolsky's involvement with the museum. His work is outstanding - vibrant, colorful and endearing. I love the Monterey area and had high hopes for the reopening of the museum. Not only was I NOT disappointed, but I was thrilled with the boldness and uniqueness of the show and with how I felt Monterey had somehow turned a corner in terms of artistic vision - putting its best foot forward, as it were. The museum board should be awarded for 'thinking outside the box' and for offering something truly original and so suitable to the space and the local environment. I read through the Monterey Weekly looking for rave reviews, local pride in the event and a narrative geared towards an optimistic future for the arts in Monterey. Instead, I find myself confronted with an article focusing on 'Board mismanagement and conflicts of interest'. Ha! Thank God someone on the board was good friends with an artist like Andre Mirapolsky! How the heck else do you reach someone of that caliber? And why would anyone be on the board of a museum if they were unable to make the connections necessary to provide top-tier artists? Public bidding to find someone local? For what...to paint seagulls on the roof? If the city wants to see a plan to 'allay concerns about the museum's new direction', I suggest they buy a ticket and walk through the doors with eyes unvarnished by the past. In so doing, maybe, just maybe they will glimpse the future. Thank you, Jake Stern

"We must uncenter our minds from ourselves; We must unhmanize our views a little, and become confident As the rock and ocean that we were made from." - Robinson Jeffers

Posted 14 June 2011, 2:45 p.m. Suggest removal

JackTensing says...

This article strikes me as completely off base. Rebecca, have you seen the Museum before and after it reopened? If you did, you'd see a drastic improvement. The Miripolsky murals are beautiful, astonishingly detailed, and historically accurate. The museum was lucky to have a visionary like him on board. The video interviews that run in the museum provide the most comprehensive video history of Monterey available. The plastics exhibit is fantastic.

Take a look at all this, and then take a look at the ghost town that the place once was, and tell me your really "concerned" about its direction. For once it's become an interesting place to be.

All we have in the article above are some disgruntled former employees, ousted for their uselessness, who had nothing to do with the new changes, and have chosen to be petty and immature about it.

They forget that the function of the Museum is to inform the public of our culture and history, and to make it fun and interesting. It's not the political tug of war implied by Tim Thomas, and it's certainly not supposed to be the empty garage sale it was before, when they were in charge.

Posted 15 June 2011, 10:09 a.m. Suggest removal

MarkBaer says...

As an MHAA board member I find the distortion of reality in this article almost laughable. I suppose it is always easier to tear down than to build. I am very proud of the creative team that was assembled to get the museum open and feel the city should also be proud. Our leader, Tom Hood, was heroic and deserves a round of applause. He was the driving force. John Baily will be missed and his service to the organization was highly valued. Only John knows why he decided to step down and innuendo that it was because of the board's mismanagement is erroneous. John - we wish you the best. As to Tim Thomas - he was, as he stated, ill treated in the past. He has a right to harbor bitterness and I want to express my appreciation for all the help he has given me on the 100 Story Project. He is a terrific historian and I am saddened that he feels used. Tim, once again I'd like to offer the olive branch. I am hopeful we can get past this corrosive sludge and that you will be very active at museum in the future. Mark Baer - woofco@aol.com

Posted 15 June 2011, 12:50 p.m. Suggest removal

DoctorQ9 says...

I visited "MOM" for the first time since the old Knight
Maritime museum was closed. Sorry, but the new
museum does not have the heart and soul of the original.
It lacks focus and a cohesive narrative. What was so wrong
about the original museum?

Posted 31 August 2011, 7:07 p.m. Suggest removal

Log in to comment